Near discussion on art

I am currently in my instructor training. We have class all day and I learn about personality types, presentation techniques, lesson plans, etc—generally the skills needed to function as a teacher.

In our class is a smattering of personalities and ranks from throughout the building. Some are at the schoolhouse to teach officers, some with returning service members in advanced classes, and the rest, like myself, are to instruct new troops, fresh out of training.

Each hour of instruction has with it a 10-minute break. During one of those breaks, I almost had an interesting conversation about writing, books, what makes “good” art, and the state of modern communication.

The teacher of the hour that had just wrapped up was an Air Force NCO. She and I started talking about…well, I’ve forgotten it presently. Anyway, something was mentioned about the new Harry Potter book and its author, J.K. Rowling.

I mentioned my astonishment that the woman was now a billionaire—not that she didn’t deserve to be, but I can’t wrap my mind around money like $1,000,000,000. That’s a heaping lot of cash.

“She’s suuuch a good writer,” my teacher gushed.

“Well, that’s arguable,” I countered. She furrowed her brow, wondering, I think, if I was going to go on some sort of anti-Harry Potter diatribe. I continued. “Some point out that her prose is a little clumsy. You know—not anything along the lines of the quote, ‘great’ authors.”

She shrugged and nodded.

“But she connects with her audience,” I said. “And if an artist can connect with his or her audience, then there’s some greatness in that. But what makes a ‘good’ writer? Is it the work itself or how much it sells?”

“Well, she’s definitely a success! Look at how many copies she’s sold,” the lieutenant colonel interjected. He sat next to me and had returned to his seat, entering the conversation.

“But don’t you think there are those who defend the quality of the art?” I asked. “I mean, those who study it and appreciate it and can operate at a certain level; don’t you think they should have a say in what is or isn’t good art, rather than just sales receipts?”

He shrugged. “She sells a lot of books. That’s a good writer by my book.”

“But, anyway, it’s exciting to be in media these days,” I said. “We’re seeing a shift. It used to be that to be in media, you had to belong to a big newspaper or a big TV station. Now, though, things are shifting toward the end user. The user is creating his or her own content—bloggers, podcasters, people are creating their own stuff.”

“But they aren’t real journalists,” the light colonel said.

“They’re significant. They’re content creators. People read their stuff.”

“They’re small time. You have to have a certain set of standards in your writing. It’s what we teach. Are you saying they don’t need us anymore?”

“Well, sir, some bloggers are very influential. They’re being invited to press conferences and are involved in lots of political races. It’s the future.”

“I don’t believe that. You show me a blog that has circulation that’s larger than our base newspapers. Larger than the Fort Hood paper? C’mon.”

With that the break ended and we had to start class again.

Interesting contradictions.

###

About salemonz

Born in San Diego, Calif. Raised as a Navy Brat, I jumped ship and crossed over to the Army. Served as an enlisted journalist for a bunch of years, then helped the DoD figure out what the hell to do with social media. After the Army, now I drift down the river of life, trying not to be a jerk.

4 responses to “Near discussion on art”

  1. Adrian says :

    Next time you talk to him remind him that a blog helped bring down Trent Lott after his comments about Thurman. They helped end Dan Rather’s anchoring career after the Bush’s service. They hgelped bring to light that Florida congressman who liked texting interns.

    Tell him! Tell him!

    and enjoy your break..

  2. Joshua says :

    Bah! There’s no way anything someone else does can be “better” than anything I do.

    My mind is made up, don’t confuse me with the facts!

  3. Felyne says :

    The masses speak. Reminds me of the film Strictly Ballroom. “oh the audience, the audience, what would they know! Your steps were crowd pleasing sure, but where was your floor craft?”

    Art is much like Beauty – in the eye of the beholder.

    You could liken it to Britney Spears I suppose, she has made a fortune selling music but would you call her a musician?

  4. finch says :

    i think the air force person said it perfectly although i don’t think she realized what she said – yes, Rowling is a “success” – but that doesn’t necessarily mean that she is a good/great writer…hell, Shamylon(sp?) has made a crapload of money, but that sure as hell doesn’t mean he’s a good director (damnnnnn Youuuuu SHHHHAMYLON!)…as for the LTC, i’m assuming you brought him in a nice list of blogs that are read daily by 10times as many folks as the freggin’ Sentinal “newpaper” sheesh what a marooon! bong…(and that’s the most i’ve written in MONTHS haH!)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: